n8n vs Make: Which Workflow Automation Platform Is Better? [2026 Comparison]
Compare self-hosted n8n with cloud-based Make (formerly Integromat) on pricing, extensibility, privacy, and usability. Find the best automation foundation for your needs.
Verdict:n8n and Make take different approaches to workflow automation. n8n is open-source and self-hostable for complete data control and unlimited execution. Code nodes and LangChain integration enable advanced developer customization. Make is cloud-based with an intuitive visual editor and 1,800+ integrations for fast no-code automation. For data privacy and developer-level customization, choose n8n. For quick no-code setup, choose Make.
Table of Contents
n8n & Make Overview
n8n
An open-source workflow automation platform. Self-hostable for complete data control. Supports code nodes for custom logic and AI agent building with LangChain integration. Developer-oriented.
Learn more about n8n →Make
Formerly Integromat. A cloud-based visual flow editor for complex automation workflows. 1,800+ app integrations with intuitive UI for no-code advanced automation.
Learn more about Make →Feature & Pricing Comparison
| Feature | n8n | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Community Free (self-host) / Cloud Starter €20/mo / Pro €50/mo | Free / Core $10.59/mo / Pro $18.82/mo / Teams $34.12/mo |
| Self-Hosting | Yes (Docker/npm, completely free) | No (cloud only) |
| Open Source | Yes (fair-code license) | No (proprietary) |
| App Integrations | 400+ plus custom node creation | 1,800+ |
| Code Customization | JavaScript/Python code nodes for full customization | Limited (primarily no-code) |
| AI Features | AI agent building (LangChain integration) | AI integration modules available |
| Data Privacy | Self-hosted for complete data control | Cloud (processed on Make's servers) |
| Ease of Use | Somewhat technical (developer-oriented) | Intuitive visual editor |
| Multilingual Support | English UI (community translations) | English UI (community support available) |
| Execution Limits | Unlimited on self-hosted | Plan-based operation limits |
Our Verdict
Our Verdict
n8n and Make take different approaches to workflow automation. n8n is open-source and self-hostable for complete data control and unlimited execution. Code nodes and LangChain integration enable advanced developer customization. Make is cloud-based with an intuitive visual editor and 1,800+ integrations for fast no-code automation. For data privacy and developer-level customization, choose n8n. For quick no-code setup, choose Make.
Recommendations by Use Case
Self-hosted automation with full data control
Self-hosting ensures complete data privacy. GDPR-compliant and safe for processing confidential data.
Quick no-code workflow automation
Intuitive visual flow editor enables complex automation without technical expertise. 1,800+ app integrations.
Building AI agents into advanced automation
LangChain integration and code nodes enable flexible AI agent workflow construction.
Detailed Reviews
More Comparisons
Squibler vs NolanAI
A 6-point comparison of AI screenplay tools Squibler and NolanAI, covering script generation, industry-standard formatting, structure support, collaboration, and pricing, plus how Sudowrite differs.
NovelAI vs Sudowrite
A detailed 6-point comparison of NovelAI and Sudowrite, the go-to AI novel-writing tools. We break down pricing, prose style, long-form support, and the editing environment, and explain where the third option, Novelcrafter, fits.
InVideo AI vs Pictory
Compare InVideo AI and Pictory for AI photo slideshow video creation across pricing, generation method, assets, music, and export quality. We also cover narration-focused Fliki to help you choose by use case.
Jenni AI vs QuillBot
Compare Jenni AI, QuillBot, and Grammarly for AI-assisted essay and academic writing. Evaluate price, text generation, paraphrasing, citations, plagiarism checking, and language support to find the best fit for papers and English writing.
AI Marketing Tools by Our Team
SaaS products developed and operated by the AIpedia team.