Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5: Which Frontier Model Wins for Your Workload? (2026)
Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 and OpenAI GPT-5: pricing, reasoning, context length, coding, and agentic capabilities. Pick the right top-tier LLM for your team.
Verdict:Claude Opus 4.7 leads on coding, long-horizon agents, and 1M-token document analysis. GPT-5 leads on integrated multimodal (Sora 2, DALL-E) and consumer ecosystem reach (GPTs). Engineering and document-heavy workflows favor Claude Opus 4.7; creative, multimodal, and consumer-facing products favor GPT-5. Many teams use both via API for different jobs.
Table of Contents
Claude Opus 4.7 & ChatGPT (GPT-5) Overview
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic's flagship 2026 model. 1M-token context, top-tier long-horizon agentic stability, and SOTA-level coding scores on SWE-bench Verified.
Learn more about Claude Opus 4.7 →ChatGPT (GPT-5)
OpenAI's frontier model available inside ChatGPT. Industry-leading multimodal integration (Sora 2, DALL-E 3, Code Interpreter) and Codex coding agent.
Learn more about ChatGPT (GPT-5) →Feature & Pricing Comparison
| Feature | Claude Opus 4.7 | ChatGPT (GPT-5) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (~750K words) | 400,000+ (in ChatGPT) |
| Reasoning mode | Extended Thinking | GPT-5 Thinking / Pro |
| Coding (SWE-bench Verified) | Industry-leading | Top tier (with Codex) |
| Multimodal | Text, image, code (no native video gen) | Text, image, audio, video (Sora 2) |
| Agent execution | Claude Code, Computer Use, MCP | ChatGPT Agent Mode, Operator |
| API price (input) | $15 / 1M tokens | $10+ / 1M tokens (GPT-5 family) |
| API price (output) | $75 / 1M tokens | $40+ / 1M tokens (GPT-5 family) |
| Personal subscription | Claude Pro $20 / Max $100-200 | ChatGPT Plus $20 / Pro $200 |
| Japanese fluency | Top tier | Top tier |
| MCP support | Native (proposed by Anthropic) | Adopting |
| Prompt caching | Up to 90% reduction | Supported |
| Enterprise availability | Bedrock, Vertex AI, Azure | Azure OpenAI Service, Enterprise |
Our Verdict
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.7 leads on coding, long-horizon agents, and 1M-token document analysis. GPT-5 leads on integrated multimodal (Sora 2, DALL-E) and consumer ecosystem reach (GPTs). Engineering and document-heavy workflows favor Claude Opus 4.7; creative, multimodal, and consumer-facing products favor GPT-5. Many teams use both via API for different jobs.
Recommendations by Use Case
Software engineering and coding
SOTA SWE-bench Verified scores plus Claude Code's autonomous execution
Million-token document analysis
1M context avoids chunking; coherent reasoning across the whole corpus
Multimodal creative work (video/image)
Sora 2 and DALL-E 3 in one platform
Consumer-facing product integration
GPTs ecosystem and brand recognition lower adoption friction
AWS Bedrock / Salesforce shops
Bedrock and Salesforce have leaned in on Claude
Cost-sensitive single-shot tasks
GPT-5 family API pricing tends to be cheaper; Plus at $20 still very capable
Detailed Reviews
More Comparisons
Squibler vs NolanAI
A 6-point comparison of AI screenplay tools Squibler and NolanAI, covering script generation, industry-standard formatting, structure support, collaboration, and pricing, plus how Sudowrite differs.
NovelAI vs Sudowrite
A detailed 6-point comparison of NovelAI and Sudowrite, the go-to AI novel-writing tools. We break down pricing, prose style, long-form support, and the editing environment, and explain where the third option, Novelcrafter, fits.
InVideo AI vs Pictory
Compare InVideo AI and Pictory for AI photo slideshow video creation across pricing, generation method, assets, music, and export quality. We also cover narration-focused Fliki to help you choose by use case.
Jenni AI vs QuillBot
Compare Jenni AI, QuillBot, and Grammarly for AI-assisted essay and academic writing. Evaluate price, text generation, paraphrasing, citations, plagiarism checking, and language support to find the best fit for papers and English writing.
AI Marketing Tools by Our Team
SaaS products developed and operated by the AIpedia team.